Hi Marc, On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 11:16:48AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > When booting on a CPU that has a countertum on the counter read, > we use the arch_counter_get_cnt{v,p}ct_stable() backend which > applies the workaround. > > However, we don't do the same thing when an affected CPU is > a secondary CPU, and we're stuck with the standard sched_clock() > backend that knows nothing about the workaround. > > Fix it by always indirecting sched_clock(), making arch_timer_read_counter > a function instead of a function pointer. In turn, we update the > pointer (now private to the driver code) when detecting a new > workaround. > > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Reported-by: Yogesh Lal <quic_ylal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> > Fixes: 0ea415390cd3 ("clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Use arch_timer_read_counter to access stable counters") > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ca4679a0-7f29-65f4-54b9-c575248192f1@xxxxxxxxxxx > --- > drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++----------- > include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) I'm just going through the patch backlog and I think this thread ended with Mark's review. Do you intend to post an updated version? Cheers, Will