Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: kfence: fix using kfence_metadata without initialization" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:27:54PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Mar 28, 2023, at 21:19, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:02:27PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 2023/3/28 20:01, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>> The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
> >>> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> >>> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> >>> id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> >>> 
> >>> To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
> >>> 
> >>> git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
> >>> git checkout FETCH_HEAD
> >>> git cherry-pick -x 1c86a188e03156223a34d09ce290b49bd4dd0403
> >>> # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
> >>> git commit -s
> >>> git send-email --to '<stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' --in-reply-to '16800049118459@xxxxxxxxx' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^..
> >>> 
> >>> Possible dependencies:
> >>> 
> >>> 1c86a188e031 ("mm: kfence: fix using kfence_metadata without initialization in show_object()")
> >>> b33f778bba5e ("kfence: alloc kfence_pool after system startup")
> >>> 698361bca2d5 ("kfence: allow re-enabling KFENCE after system startup")
> >>> 07e8481d3c38 ("kfence: always use static branches to guard kfence_alloc()")
> >>> 08f6b10630f2 ("kfence: limit currently covered allocations when pool nearly full")
> >>> a9ab52bbcb52 ("kfence: move saving stack trace of allocations into __kfence_alloc()")
> >>> 9a19aeb56650 ("kfence: count unexpectedly skipped allocations")
> >>> 
> >>> thanks,
> >>> 
> >>> greg k-h
> >>> 
> >>> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> >>> 
> >>> From 1c86a188e03156223a34d09ce290b49bd4dd0403 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>> From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 11:44:41 +0800
> >>> Subject: [PATCH] mm: kfence: fix using kfence_metadata without initialization
> >>>  in show_object()
> >>> 
> >>> The variable kfence_metadata is initialized in kfence_init_pool(), then,
> >>> it is not initialized if kfence is disabled after booting.  In this case,
> >>> kfence_metadata will be used (e.g.  ->lock and ->state fields) without
> >>> initialization when reading /sys/kernel/debug/kfence/objects.  There will
> >>> be a warning if you enable CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK.  Fix it by creating
> >>> debugfs files when necessary.
> >>> 
> >>> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230315034441.44321-1-songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Fixes: 0ce20dd84089 ("mm: add Kernel Electric-Fence infrastructure")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> 
> >>> diff --git a/mm/kfence/core.c b/mm/kfence/core.c
> >>> index 5349c37a5dac..79c94ee55f97 100644
> >>> --- a/mm/kfence/core.c
> >>> +++ b/mm/kfence/core.c
> >>> @@ -726,10 +726,14 @@ static const struct seq_operations objects_sops = {
> >>>  };
> >>>  DEFINE_SEQ_ATTRIBUTE(objects);
> >>> -static int __init kfence_debugfs_init(void)
> >>> +static int kfence_debugfs_init(void)
> >>>  {
> >>> - struct dentry *kfence_dir = debugfs_create_dir("kfence", NULL);
> >>> + struct dentry *kfence_dir;
> >>> + if (!READ_ONCE(kfence_enabled))
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + kfence_dir = debugfs_create_dir("kfence", NULL);
> >>>   debugfs_create_file("stats", 0444, kfence_dir, NULL, &stats_fops);
> >>>   debugfs_create_file("objects", 0400, kfence_dir, NULL, &objects_fops);
> >>>   return 0;
> >>> @@ -883,6 +887,8 @@ static int kfence_init_late(void)
> >>>   }
> >>>   kfence_init_enable();
> >>> + kfence_debugfs_init();
> >>> +
> >>>   return 0;
> >>>  }
> >> 
> >> I have implemented a following patch based on v5.15 branch.
> >> 
> >> From ba26f344fa3e477456a3cc60488a7b8e5af0e88d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 11:44:41 +0800
> >> Subject: [PATCH] mm: kfence: fix using kfence_metadata without
> >> initialization
> >>  in show_object()
> >> 
> >> The variable kfence_metadata is initialized in kfence_init_pool(), then,
> >> it is not initialized if kfence is disabled after booting.  In this case,
> >> kfence_metadata will be used (e.g.  ->lock and ->state fields) without
> >> initialization when reading /sys/kernel/debug/kfence/objects.  There will
> >> be a warning if you enable CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK.  Fix it by creating
> >> debugfs files when necessary.
> >> 
> >> Link:
> >> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230315034441.44321-1-songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Fixes: 0ce20dd84089 ("mm: add Kernel Electric-Fence infrastructure")
> >> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  mm/kfence/core.c | 8 ++++++--
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/mm/kfence/core.c b/mm/kfence/core.c
> >> index 39a6c434e355..573f34e6af0b 100644
> >> --- a/mm/kfence/core.c
> >> +++ b/mm/kfence/core.c
> >> @@ -678,10 +678,14 @@ static const struct file_operations objects_fops = {
> >>      .release = seq_release,
> >>  };
> >> 
> > 
> > Patch is corrupted with the whitespace eaten by your email client.  Can
> > you resend this in a format that it can be applied?
> 
> I attach it here. Could you apply it? Thanks.

That worked, thanks!




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux