Re: [PATCH 4.19 161/252] x86/microcode/amd: Remove load_microcode_amd()s bsp parameter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2023-03-20 at 14:12 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 02:49:53AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-03-10 at 14:38 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > From: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > commit 2355370cd941cbb20882cc3f34460f9f2b8f9a18 upstream.
> > > 
> > > It is always the BSP.
> > > 
> > > No functional changes.
> > > 
> > 
> > Does this not depend on commit 2071c0aeda22 "x86/microcode: Simplify
> > init path even more"?  That hasn't been backported to any stable
> > branches.
> 
> It didn't seem to need it to at least build properly.  And it doesn't
> apply to the stable branches, so are you sure it's needed?

This commit message says that load_microcode_amd() is always called
with bsp=true.  That doesn't seem to have been true before commit
2071c0aeda22, though I haven't tested it.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Usenet is essentially a HUGE group of people passing notes in class.
                 - Rachel Kadel, `A Quick Guide to Newsgroup Etiquette'

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux