On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 01:57:19PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote: > > This patch fixes an issue that a hugetlb uffd-wr-protected mapping can be > > writable even with uffd-wp bit set. It only happens with all these > > conditions met: (1) hugetlb memory (2) private mapping (3) original mapping > > was missing, then (4) being wr-protected (IOW, pte marker installed). Then > ^^^^ > Nit, but is the word "then" intended to be there? Almost makes it sound as > if wr-protected was a result of the previous 3 conditions being met. Not intended.. Since this is not fixup-able, I'll reword here when I'll need to repost. [...] > Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! -- Peter Xu
