On 3/21/23 08:15, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi Geert! > > On Tue, 2023-03-21 at 09:47 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> Yeah, this explains it then. Your new patch is definitely the better approach >>> and I would prefer it over Randy's suggested change. Let's see what the mm >>> maintainers have to say. >> >> I'm sure the missed condition was just an oversight, so I expect no >> objections. > > And you were right, of course. We can drop Randy's patch then, but I'll pick up > all the other patches tomorrow when I prepare my for-next tree for 6.4. Right, drop it. Thanks, everyone. -- ~Randy
