Re: [PATCH 5.4 084/357] treewide: Replace DECLARE_TASKLET() with DECLARE_TASKLET_OLD()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 02:36:13PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> [ Upstream commit b13fecb1c3a603c4b8e99b306fecf4f668c11b32 ]
> 
> This converts all the existing DECLARE_TASKLET() (and ...DISABLED)
> macros with DECLARE_TASKLET_OLD() in preparation for refactoring the
> tasklet callback type. All existing DECLARE_TASKLET() users had a "0"
> data argument, it has been removed here as well.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Stable-dep-of: 1fdeb8b9f29d ("wifi: iwl3945: Add missing check for create_singlethread_workqueue")
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

I noticed kernelci.org bot (5.4) reports:

    Build Failures Detected:

    mips:
        ip27_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL
        ip28_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL
        lasat_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL

    Errors summary:

    1    arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:87:20: error: ‘pvc_display_tasklet’ undeclared (first use in this function)
    1    arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:42:44: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘&’ token
    1    arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:33:13: error: ‘pvc_display’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/64041dda.170a0220.8cc25.79c9@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Here's what I found...
this backport to 5.4.y of:
b13fecb1c3a6 ("treewide: Replace DECLARE_TASKLET() with DECLARE_TASKLET_OLD()")
changed all locations of DECLARE_TASKLET with DECLARE_TASKLET_OLD,
except one, in arch/mips/lasat/pcivue_proc.c.

This is due to:
10760dde9be3 ("MIPS: Remove support for LASAT") preceeding
b13fecb1c3a6 ("treewide: Replace DECLARE_TASKLET() with DECLARE_TASKLET_OLD()")
upstream and the former not being present in 5.4.y.

I rolled a revert/re-apply with fixes in the attached mbox,
however maybe just a revert makes more sense?  Up to you.

I have yet to try building this on mips, just did this by inspection.

Regards,

--Tom

Attachment: mips_declare_tasklet.mbox
Description: application/mbox


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux