On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:17:33 +0200 Louis Peens wrote: > From: Xiaoyu Li <xiaoyu.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Before the referenced commit, when we requested a > certain number of interrupts, if we could not meet > the requirements, the number of interrupts supported > by the hardware would be returned. But after the > referenced commit, if the hardware failed to meet > the requirements, the error of invalid argument > would be directly returned, which caused a regression > in the nfp driver preventing probing to complete. > > Fixes: bab65e48cb06 ("PCI/MSI: Sanitize MSI-X checks") > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Xiaoyu Li <xiaoyu.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Thomas, is this an expected side effect? The commit message of bab65e48cb06 ("PCI/MSI: Sanitize MSI-X checks") makes it sound like only a harmless refactoring was intended. > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c > index 62f0bf91d1e1..0e4cab38f075 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c > @@ -370,6 +370,12 @@ nfp_net_irqs_alloc(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct msix_entry *irq_entries, > { > unsigned int i; > int got_irqs; > + int max_irqs; > + > + max_irqs = pci_msix_vec_count(pdev); > + if (max_irqs < 0) > + return max_irqs; > + wanted_irqs = min_t(unsigned int, max_irqs, wanted_irqs); > > for (i = 0; i < wanted_irqs; i++) > irq_entries[i].entry = i;