On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 09:56:16PM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > No upstream commit exists for this commit. > > The issue was introduced with backporting upstream commit c16bda37594f > ("io_uring/poll: allow some retries for poll triggering spuriously"). > > Memory allocation can possibly fail causing invalid pointer be > dereferenced just before comparing it to NULL value. > > Move the pointer check in proper place (upstream has the similar location > of the check). In case the request has REQ_F_POLLED flag up, apoll can't > be NULL so no need to check there. > > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller. > > Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > io_uring/io_uring.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c > index 445afda927f4..fd799567fc23 100644 > --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c > +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c > @@ -5792,10 +5792,10 @@ static int io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req) > } > } else { > apoll = kmalloc(sizeof(*apoll), GFP_ATOMIC); > + if (unlikely(!apoll)) > + return IO_APOLL_ABORTED; How can you trigger a GFP_ATOMIC memory failure? If you do, worse things are about to happen to your system, right? thanks, greg k-h