On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 08:59:14AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 3/15/23 08:44, Daniel Díaz wrote: > > Hello! > > > > On 15/03/23 06:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.278 release. > > > There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Fri, 17 Mar 2023 11:57:10 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.278-rc1.gz > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > Lots and lots of failures, mostly Arm. > > > > For Arm, Arm64, MIPS, with GCC-8, GCC-9, GCC-10, GCC-11, GCC-12, Clang-16, for some combinations with: > > * axm55xx_defconfig > > * davinci_all_defconfig > > * defconfig > > * defconfig-40bc7ee5 > > * lkftconfig-kasan > > * multi_v5_defconfig > > * s5pv210_defconfig > > * sama5_defconfig > > > > -----8<----- > > /builds/linux/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2237:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_online_cpus' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > > get_online_cpus(); > > ^ > > /builds/linux/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2237:2: note: did you mean 'get_online_mems'? > > /builds/linux/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:258:20: note: 'get_online_mems' declared here > > static inline void get_online_mems(void) {} > > ^ > > /builds/linux/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2248:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'put_online_cpus' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > > put_online_cpus(); > > ^ > > /builds/linux/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2248:2: note: did you mean 'put_online_mems'? > > /builds/linux/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:259:20: note: 'put_online_mems' declared here > > static inline void put_online_mems(void) {} > > ^ > > 2 errors generated. > > make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:303: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.o] Error 1 > > ----->8----- > > > > > > For Arm64, i386 x86, with GCC-11, Perf has a new error: > > > > -----8<----- > > In function 'ready', > > inlined from 'sender' at bench/sched-messaging.c:90:2: > > bench/sched-messaging.c:76:13: error: 'dummy' is used uninitialized [-Werror=uninitialized] > > 76 | if (write(ready_out, &dummy, 1) != 1) > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > In file included from bench/../perf-sys.h:5, > > from bench/../perf.h:18, > > from bench/sched-messaging.c:13: > > ----->8----- > > > > > > Greetings! > > > > Daniel Díaz > > daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > Looks like this whole set of release candidates is a disaster. I have stopped > my testbed for the time being (no point in wasting energy), so there won't be > any further updates from me for the time being. Thanks, yeah, looks like only x86 seems to work here, I'll drop a bunch of patches and push out -rc2 later tonight. sorry for the mess, turns out that lots of different set of backports broke arches they were not expecting to :( greg k-h
