From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit f54aa97fb7e5329a373f9df4e5e213ced4fc8759 ]
The condition determining whether the preallocation can be used had
an off-by-one error so we didn't discard preallocation when new
allocation was just following it. This can then confuse code in
inode_getblk().
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 16d055656814 ("udf: Discard preallocation before extending file with a hole")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/udf/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/udf/inode.c b/fs/udf/inode.c
index 259152a08852b..a4e875b61f895 100644
--- a/fs/udf/inode.c
+++ b/fs/udf/inode.c
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static int udf_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
* Block beyond EOF and prealloc extents? Just discard preallocation
* as it is not useful and complicates things.
*/
- if (((loff_t)block) << inode->i_blkbits > iinfo->i_lenExtents)
+ if (((loff_t)block) << inode->i_blkbits >= iinfo->i_lenExtents)
udf_discard_prealloc(inode);
udf_clear_extent_cache(inode);
phys = inode_getblk(inode, block, &err, &new);
--
2.39.2
