Re: [PATCH 0/7] Backport uclamp vs margin fixes into 5.15.y

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Backport uclamp vs margin fixes into 5.15.y
From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 09:03:45 +0100
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20230308162207.2886641-1-qyousef@layalina.io>

On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 04:22:00PM +0000, Qais Yousef wrote:
> Portion of the fixes were ported in 5.15 but missed some.
> 
> This ports the remainder of the fixes.
> 
> Based on 5.15.98.
> 
> Build tested on x86 with and without uclamp config enabled.

Now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] Backport uclamp vs margin fixes into 5.15.y
  - From: Greg KH

References:
- [PATCH 0/7] Backport uclamp vs margin fixes into 5.15.y
  - From: Qais Yousef

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5.15.y 1/3] KVM: nVMX: Don't use Enlightened MSR Bitmap for L3
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Backport uclamp vs margin fixes into 5.10.y
Previous by thread: [PATCH 7/7] sched/fair: Fixes for capacity inversion detection
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Backport uclamp vs margin fixes into 5.15.y
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux