3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> commit 34e97f170149bfa14979581c4c748bc9b4b79d5b upstream. Both normal IO and resync IO can be retried with reschedule_retry() and so be counted into ->nr_queued, but only normal IO gets counted in ->nr_pending. Before the recent improvement to RAID1 resync there could only possibly have been one or the other on the queue. When handling a read failure it could only be normal IO. So when handle_read_error() called freeze_array() the fact that freeze_array only compares ->nr_queued against ->nr_pending was safe. But now that these two types can interleave, we can have both normal and resync IO requests queued, so we need to count them both in nr_pending. This error can lead to freeze_array() hanging if there is a read error, so it is suitable for -stable. Fixes: 79ef3a8aa1cb1523cc231c9a90a278333c21f761 Reported-by: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/md/raid1.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c @@ -856,6 +856,7 @@ static void raise_barrier(struct r1conf conf->next_resync + RESYNC_SECTORS), conf->resync_lock); + conf->nr_pending++; spin_unlock_irq(&conf->resync_lock); } @@ -865,6 +866,7 @@ static void lower_barrier(struct r1conf BUG_ON(conf->barrier <= 0); spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->resync_lock, flags); conf->barrier--; + conf->nr_pending--; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->resync_lock, flags); wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier); } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html