Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/136] 5.15.100-rc1 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Greg,

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 02:42:02PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.100 release.
> There are 136 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 12 Mar 2023 13:36:38 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20230210):
mips: 62 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Failed to boot on my test laptop.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

Note:
Failed to boot on my test laptop, just black screen.
Bisect pointed to 4eb6789f9177 ("drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC")
which was added in v5.15.99. I failed to test v5.15.99 due to lack of time. :(


[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3075
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3084

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Regards
Sudip



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux