Re: Possible kernel fs block code regression in 6.2.3 umounting usb drives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 02:53:19PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 04:08:21PM -0500, Genes Lists wrote:
> > On 3/10/23 15:23, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On 3/10/23 1:16 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > ...
> > > But I would revert:
> > > 
> > > bfe46d2efe46c5c952f982e2ca94fe2ec5e58e2a
> > > 57a425badc05c2e87e9f25713e5c3c0298e4202c
> > > 
> > > in that order from 6.2.3 and see if that helps. Adding Yu.
> > > 
> > Confirm the 2 Reverts fixed in my tests as well (nvme + sata drives).
> > Nasty crash - some needed to be power cycled as they hung on shutdown.
> > 
> > Thank you!
> > 
> > gene
> > 
> > 
> 
> Great, thanks.  BTW, 6.1 is also affected.  A simple reproducer is to run:
> 
> 	dmsetup create dev --table "0 128 zero"
> 	dmsetup remove dev
> 
> The following kconfigs are needed for the bug to be hit:
> 
> 	CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP=y
> 	CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING=y
> 	CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING_LOW=y
> 
> Sasha or Greg, can you please revert the indicated commits from 6.1 and 6.2?

Yes, will go do that right now, thanks for debugging this so quickly!

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux