From: Chao Yu <chao@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 8c0ed062ce27f6b7f0a568cb241e2b4dd2d9e6a6 ]
nr_free may be less than len, we should update age extent cache
w/ range [fofs, len] rather than [fofs, nr_free].
Fixes: 71644dff4811 ("f2fs: add block_age-based extent cache")
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/f2fs/file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 63d468b1a9b82..cd1c6ed89d5ef 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ void f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range(struct dnode_of_data *dn, int count)
fofs = f2fs_start_bidx_of_node(ofs_of_node(dn->node_page),
dn->inode) + ofs;
f2fs_update_read_extent_cache_range(dn, fofs, 0, len);
- f2fs_update_age_extent_cache_range(dn, fofs, nr_free);
+ f2fs_update_age_extent_cache_range(dn, fofs, len);
dec_valid_block_count(sbi, dn->inode, nr_free);
}
dn->ofs_in_node = ofs;
--
2.39.2
