On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 1:24 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quilt should be depending on patch here, I think it's something in my
> set of "turn this series of patches into a mbox, split the mbox up into
> patches" sequence that is causing the problem.
Well, it might also be that quilt just re-generates the patch with
'diff', and then in the process loses the information again.
We can happily continue to support the "we lost the executable bit",
since it sounds like Nathan is willing to cook up a patch.
I'm just too lazy and personally unaffected to care (and too busy with
merges - excuses, excuses).
Linus
