From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> commit d61615c366a489646a1bfe5b33455f916762d5f4 upstream. Code blocks handling BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM5357 and BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM53572 were incorrectly unified. Chip package values are not unique and cannot be checked independently. They are meaningful only in a context of a given chip. Packages BCM5358 and BCM47188 share the same value but then belong to different chips. Code unification resulted in treating BCM5358 as BCM47188 and broke its initialization. Link: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/8278 Fixes: cb1b0f90acfe ("net: ethernet: bgmac: unify code of the same family") Cc: Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230208091637.16291-1-zajec5@xxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-bcma.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-bcma.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-bcma.c @@ -222,12 +222,12 @@ static int bgmac_probe(struct bcma_devic bgmac->feature_flags |= BGMAC_FEAT_CLKCTLST; bgmac->feature_flags |= BGMAC_FEAT_FLW_CTRL1; bgmac->feature_flags |= BGMAC_FEAT_SW_TYPE_PHY; - if (ci->pkg == BCMA_PKG_ID_BCM47188 || - ci->pkg == BCMA_PKG_ID_BCM47186) { + if ((ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM5357 && ci->pkg == BCMA_PKG_ID_BCM47186) || + (ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM53572 && ci->pkg == BCMA_PKG_ID_BCM47188)) { bgmac->feature_flags |= BGMAC_FEAT_SW_TYPE_RGMII; bgmac->feature_flags |= BGMAC_FEAT_IOST_ATTACHED; } - if (ci->pkg == BCMA_PKG_ID_BCM5358) + if (ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM5357 && ci->pkg == BCMA_PKG_ID_BCM5358) bgmac->feature_flags |= BGMAC_FEAT_SW_TYPE_EPHYRMII; break; case BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM53573: