Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/134] 5.10.168-rc2 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Greg,

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 06:41:06PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.168 release.
> There are 134 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:25:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

My builds have tested f90240a238a9 v5.10.168-rc3 but I am not seeing
any mail for that, bit confused now.

The result is for v5.10.168-rc3.

Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230210):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2868
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2869


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Regards
Sudip



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux