On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 15:22, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 15:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.90 release. > > There are 117 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:48:53 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.90-rc2.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > Regressions found on arm64 for both 5.15.90-rc2 and 5.10.165-rc2. > > * qemu-arm64-mte, kselftest-arm64 > - arm64_check_buffer_fill > - arm64_check_child_memory > - arm64_check_ksm_options > - arm64_check_mmap_options > - arm64_check_tags_inclusion > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx> > > We are in a process to bisecting this problem and there are updates coming > from kselftest rootfs. The above said regressions are due to the Qemu version upgrade to 7.2. With reference to my previous emails, This is not a kernel regression on stable-rc 6.1, 5.15, and 5.10. - Naresh
