Hi Naresh, On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 04:57:52PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 21:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release. > > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.89-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. > > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx> > > NOTE: > clang-nightly build errors noticed on defconfig of arm64. arm. x86_64, > i386, riscv, s390 and powerpc. > > include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: 'struct (unnamed at > include/trace/events/initcall.h:27:1)' cannot be defined in > '__builtin_offsetof' > __field_struct(initcall_t, func) > ^ > include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: initializer element is > not a compile-time constant > __field_struct(initcall_t, func) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thanks for the report! I sent backports to avoid this issue and the one reported on the 5.4 review but it appears they did not make this round of stable updates. https://lore.kernel.org/Y8TWrJpb6Vn6E4+v@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/ Hopefully it will be cleared up next round. Cheers, Nathan
