On 1/16/23 7:49 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 07:13:40AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 1/16/23 6:42 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On 1/16/23 6:17?AM, Linux kernel regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >>>> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. >>>> >>>> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?) >>>> kernel developer don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by >>>> mail. Quoting from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216932 : >>> >>> Looks like: >>> >>> commit 6d47e0f6a535701134d950db65eb8fe1edf0b575 >>> Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Date: Wed Jan 4 08:52:06 2023 -0700 >>> >>> block: don't allow splitting of a REQ_NOWAIT bio >>> >>> got picked up by stable, but not the required prep patch: >>> >>> >>> commit 613b14884b8595e20b9fac4126bf627313827fbe >>> Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Date: Wed Jan 4 08:51:19 2023 -0700 >>> >>> block: handle bio_split_to_limits() NULL return >>> >>> Greg/team, can you pick the latter too? It'll pick cleanly for >>> 6.1-stable, not sure how far back the other patch has gone yet. >> >> Looked back, and 5.15 has it too, but the cherry-pick won't work >> on that kernel. >> >> Here's one for 5.15-stable that I verified crashes before this one, >> and works with it. Haven't done an allmodconfig yet... > > All now queued up, thanks! Thanks Greg! This one was my fault, as it was a set of 2 patches and I only marked 2/2 for stable. But how is that best handled? 1/2 could've been marked stable as well, but I don't think that would have prevented 2/2 applying fine and 1/2 failing and hence not getting queued up until I would've done a backport. What's the recommended way to describe the dependency that you only want 2/2 applied when 1/2 is in as well? -- Jens Axboe
