Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/iova: Fix alloc iova overflows issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023-01-11 06:38, yf.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Yunfei Wang <yf.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

In __alloc_and_insert_iova_range, there is an issue that retry_pfn
overflows. The value of iovad->anchor.pfn_hi is ~0UL, then when
iovad->cached_node is iovad->anchor, curr_iova->pfn_hi + 1 will
overflow. As a result, if the retry logic is executed, low_pfn is
updated to 0, and then new_pfn < low_pfn returns false to make the
allocation successful.

This issue occurs in the following two situations:
1. The first iova size exceeds the domain size. When initializing
iova domain, iovad->cached_node is assigned as iovad->anchor. For
example, the iova domain size is 10M, start_pfn is 0x1_F000_0000,
and the iova size allocated for the first time is 11M. The
following is the log information, new->pfn_lo is smaller than
iovad->cached_node.

Example log as follows:
[  223.798112][T1705487] sh: [name:iova&]__alloc_and_insert_iova_range
start_pfn:0x1f0000,retry_pfn:0x0,size:0xb00,limit_pfn:0x1f0a00
[  223.799590][T1705487] sh: [name:iova&]__alloc_and_insert_iova_range
success start_pfn:0x1f0000,new->pfn_lo:0x1efe00,new->pfn_hi:0x1f08ff

2. The node with the largest iova->pfn_lo value in the iova domain
is deleted, iovad->cached_node will be updated to iovad->anchor,
and then the alloc iova size exceeds the maximum iova size that can
be allocated in the domain.

After judging that retry_pfn is less than limit_pfn, call retry_pfn+1
to fix the overflow issue.

Signed-off-by: jianjiao zeng <jianjiao.zeng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yunfei Wang <yf.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 5.15.*

Fixes: 4e89dce72521 ("iommu/iova: Retry from last rb tree node if iova search fails")

Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>

---
v2: Update patch
     1. Cc stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        This patch needs to be merged stable branch,
        add stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in mail list.
     2. Refer robin's suggestion to update patch.

---
  drivers/iommu/iova.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iova.c b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
index a44ad92fc5eb..fe452ce46642 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iova.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,
curr = __get_cached_rbnode(iovad, limit_pfn);
  	curr_iova = to_iova(curr);
-	retry_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_hi + 1;
+	retry_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_hi;
retry:
  	do {
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,
  	if (high_pfn < size || new_pfn < low_pfn) {
  		if (low_pfn == iovad->start_pfn && retry_pfn < limit_pfn) {
  			high_pfn = limit_pfn;
-			low_pfn = retry_pfn;
+			low_pfn = retry_pfn + 1;
  			curr = iova_find_limit(iovad, limit_pfn);
  			curr_iova = to_iova(curr);
  			goto retry;



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux