From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 89481b5fa8c0640e62ba84c6020cee895f7ac643 ] When we used the journal_async_commit mounting option in nojournal mode, the kernel told me that "can't mount with journal_checksum", was very confusing. I find that when we mount with journal_async_commit, both the JOURNAL_ASYNC_COMMIT and EXPLICIT_JOURNAL_CHECKSUM flags are set. However, in the error branch, CHECKSUM is checked before ASYNC_COMMIT. As a result, the above inconsistency occurs, and the ASYNC_COMMIT branch becomes dead code that cannot be executed. Therefore, we exchange the positions of the two judgments to make the error msg more accurate. Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221109074343.4184862-1-libaokun1@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/ext4/super.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c index fd7565707975..1bb2e902667d 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/super.c +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c @@ -4667,14 +4667,15 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) goto failed_mount3a; } else { /* Nojournal mode, all journal mount options are illegal */ - if (test_opt2(sb, EXPLICIT_JOURNAL_CHECKSUM)) { + if (test_opt(sb, JOURNAL_ASYNC_COMMIT)) { ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "can't mount with " - "journal_checksum, fs mounted w/o journal"); + "journal_async_commit, fs mounted w/o journal"); goto failed_mount3a; } - if (test_opt(sb, JOURNAL_ASYNC_COMMIT)) { + + if (test_opt2(sb, EXPLICIT_JOURNAL_CHECKSUM)) { ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "can't mount with " - "journal_async_commit, fs mounted w/o journal"); + "journal_checksum, fs mounted w/o journal"); goto failed_mount3a; } if (sbi->s_commit_interval != JBD2_DEFAULT_MAX_COMMIT_AGE*HZ) { -- 2.35.1
