Re: [PATCH] efi: tpm: Avoid READ_ONCE() for accessing the event log

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 04:20:34PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 16:11, Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 10:59:48AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > Nathan reports that recent kernels built with LTO will crash when doing
> > > EFI boot using Fedora's GRUB and SHIM. The culprit turns out to be a
> > > misaligned load from the TPM event log, which is annotated with
> > > READ_ONCE(), and under LTO, this gets translated into a LDAR instruction
> > > which does not tolerate misaligned accesses.
> >
> > Interesting, that's a funny change in behaviour. READ_ONCE() of an unaligned
> > address is pretty sketchy, but if this ends up tripping lots of folks up
> > then I suppose we could use a plain load and a DMB LD as an alternative.
> > It's likely to be more expensive in the LDAPR case, though.
> >
> 
> Yeah, I am not suggesting that we change READ_ONCE(), but this case
> was definitely not taken into account at the time.

Indeed, and it looks like the architecture added SCTLR_ELx.nAA to toggle
this behaviour, although it was only added in 8.4 with FEAT_LSE2.

> > > Interestingly, this does not happen when booting the same kernel
> > > straight from the UEFI shell, and so the fact that the event log may
> > > appear misaligned in memory may be caused by a bug in GRUB or SHIM.
> > >
> > > However, using READ_ONCE() to access firmware tables is slightly unusual
> > > in any case, and here, we only need to ensure that 'event' is not
> > > dereferenced again after it gets unmapped, so a compiler barrier should
> > > be sufficient, and works around the reported issue.
> > >
> > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1782
> > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/tpm_eventlog.h | 6 ++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/tpm_eventlog.h b/include/linux/tpm_eventlog.h
> > > index 20c0ff54b7a0d313..0abcc85904cba874 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/tpm_eventlog.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/tpm_eventlog.h
> > > @@ -198,8 +198,10 @@ static __always_inline int __calc_tpm2_event_size(struct tcg_pcr_event2_head *ev
> > >        * The loop below will unmap these fields if the log is larger than
> > >        * one page, so save them here for reference:
> > >        */
> > > -     count = READ_ONCE(event->count);
> > > -     event_type = READ_ONCE(event->event_type);
> > > +     count = event->count;
> > > +     event_type = event->event_type;
> > > +
> > > +     barrier();
> >
> > It would be handy to have a comment here, but when I started thinking about
> > what that would say, it occurred to me that the unmap operation should
> > already have a barrier inside it due to the TLB invalidation, so I'm not
> > sure why this is needed at all.
> >
> 
> This is purely to prevent the compiler from accessing count or
> event_type by reloading it from the event pointer, in case it runs out
> of registers.

But that reload would only be a problem if the event has been unmapped, no?
Given that the unmapping code has a barrier() and the unmapped page is not
explicitly referenced, then I don't see the issue.

Will



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux