> On Jan 5, 2023, at 6:43 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 04:56:31PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote: >> >> >>>> On Jan 4, 2023, at 12:29 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 04:16:07PM +0000, Joel Fernandes wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:13:30AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.162 release. >>>>> There are 63 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>>> let me know. >>>>> >>>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 05 Jan 2023 08:12:47 +0000. >>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>>> >>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.162-rc1.gz >>>>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y >>>>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>> >>>> Testing fails. Could you please pick these 2 up? >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221230153215.1333921-1-joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221230153215.1333921-2-joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ >>> >>> That is not a regression from 5.10.161, right? >> >> Yes it is not. >> >>> This release is only for >>> the io_uring stuff to make sure that backport was done correctly. >>> >>> The current "to apply" queue for the stable trees is very large right >>> now due to everyone waiting to get tiny things into -rc1 instead of >>> before then, so the above two are still not yet queued up, sorry. >> >> Sure not a problem, I can resend again later if it is still not queued. > > You should have already received the email notices saying they were > queued :) I happen to take messages from Skynet with a grain of salt ;-). But thank you for the automated notification! - Joel
