Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: fix deadlock due to mbcache entry corruption" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jeremi!

On Thu 05-01-23 00:28:13, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 04:07:31PM +0100, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> > 
> > Possible dependencies:
> > 
> > a44e84a9b776 ("ext4: fix deadlock due to mbcache entry corruption")
> > 307af6c87937 ("mbcache: automatically delete entries from cache on freeing")
> > 65f8b80053a1 ("ext4: fix race when reusing xattr blocks")
> > fd48e9acdf26 ("ext4: unindent codeblock in ext4_xattr_block_set()")
> > 6bc0d63dad7f ("ext4: remove EA inode entry from mbcache on inode eviction")
> > 3dc96bba65f5 ("mbcache: add functions to delete entry if unused")
> > 58318914186c ("mbcache: don't reclaim used entries")
> > 4efd9f0d120c ("ext4: use kmemdup() to replace kmalloc + memcpy")
> > 
> 
> Hi Jan,
> 
> What do you think of the backport I shared here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20221122174807.GA9658@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Or do you think it makes more sense to backport some of the other patches
> listed above?

The backport looks good. Please submit it to stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(mentioning upstream commit ID), CC me, I'll ack it and the patch can get
merged to stable kernels. Thanks!

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux