> On Jan 4, 2023, at 12:29 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 04:16:07PM +0000, Joel Fernandes wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:13:30AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.162 release. >>> There are 63 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Thu, 05 Jan 2023 08:12:47 +0000. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.162-rc1.gz >>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> thanks, >> >> Testing fails. Could you please pick these 2 up? >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221230153215.1333921-1-joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221230153215.1333921-2-joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > That is not a regression from 5.10.161, right? Yes it is not. > This release is only for > the io_uring stuff to make sure that backport was done correctly. > > The current "to apply" queue for the stable trees is very large right > now due to everyone waiting to get tiny things into -rc1 instead of > before then, so the above two are still not yet queued up, sorry. Sure not a problem, I can resend again later if it is still not queued. Thanks, - Joel > > thanks, > > greg k-h
