On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 7:49 PM Mathias Nyman
<mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 22.12.2022 15.18, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> > On 22.12.2022 13.52, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 01:08:47PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> >>> On 22.12.2022 11.01, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 07:29:12AM +0000, Jimmy Hu wrote:
> >>>>> When the host controller is not responding, all URBs queued to all
> >>>>> endpoints need to be killed. This can cause a kernel panic if we
> >>>>> dereference an invalid endpoint.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fix this by using xhci_get_virt_ep() helper to find the endpoint and
> >>>>> checking if the endpoint is valid before dereferencing it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [233311.853271] xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.1.auto: xHCI host controller not responding, assume dead
> >>>>> [233311.853393] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000000e8
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [233311.853964] pc : xhci_hc_died+0x10c/0x270
> >>>>> [233311.853971] lr : xhci_hc_died+0x1ac/0x270
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [233311.854077] Call trace:
> >>>>> [233311.854085] xhci_hc_died+0x10c/0x270
> >>>>> [233311.854093] xhci_stop_endpoint_command_watchdog+0x100/0x1a4
> >>>>> [233311.854105] call_timer_fn+0x50/0x2d4
> >>>>> [233311.854112] expire_timers+0xac/0x2e4
> >>>>> [233311.854118] run_timer_softirq+0x300/0xabc
> >>>>> [233311.854127] __do_softirq+0x148/0x528
> >>>>> [233311.854135] irq_exit+0x194/0x1a8
> >>>>> [233311.854143] __handle_domain_irq+0x164/0x1d0
> >>>>> [233311.854149] gic_handle_irq.22273+0x10c/0x188
> >>>>> [233311.854156] el1_irq+0xfc/0x1a8
> >>>>> [233311.854175] lpm_cpuidle_enter+0x25c/0x418 [msm_pm]
> >>>>> [233311.854185] cpuidle_enter_state+0x1f0/0x764
> >>>>> [233311.854194] do_idle+0x594/0x6ac
> >>>>> [233311.854201] cpu_startup_entry+0x7c/0x80
> >>>>> [233311.854209] secondary_start_kernel+0x170/0x198
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fixes: 50e8725e7c42 ("xhci: Refactor command watchdog and fix split string.")
> >>>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jimmy Hu <hhhuuu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 5 ++++-
> >>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> >>>>> index ddc30037f9ce..f5b0e1ce22af 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> >>>>> @@ -1169,7 +1169,10 @@ static void xhci_kill_endpoint_urbs(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
> >>>>> struct xhci_virt_ep *ep;
> >>>>> struct xhci_ring *ring;
> >>>>> - ep = &xhci->devs[slot_id]->eps[ep_index];
> >>>>> + ep = xhci_get_virt_ep(xhci, slot_id, ep_index);
> >>>>> + if (!ep)
> >>>>> + return;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>
> >>>> xhci_get_virt_ep also adds check for slot_id == 0. It changes behaviour,
> >>>> do we really want to skip that slot? Original code went from 0 to
> >>>> MAX_HC_SLOTS-1.
> >>>>
> >>>> It seems to be off by one to me. Am I missing anything?
> >>>
> >>> slot_id 0 is always invalid, so this is a good change.
> >>
> >> I see. Now reading more carefully:
> >> #define HCS_MAX_SLOTS(p) (((p) >> 0) & 0xff)
> >> #define MAX_HC_SLOTS 256
> >> So the loop should go:
> >> for (i = 1; i <= HCS_MAX_SLOTS(xhci->hcs_params1); i++)
> >
> > yes
> >
> >>
> >>>> Also, what about passing ep directly to xhci_kill_endpoint_urbs
> >>>> and do the check in xhci_hc_died? Not even compile tested:
> >>>
> >>> passing ep to a function named kill_endpoint_urbs() sound like the
> >>> right thing to do, but as a generic change.
> >>>
> >>> I think its a good idea to first do a targeted fix for this null pointer
> >>> issue that we can send to stable fist.
> >>
> >> Agree. But I still do not understand the root cause. There is a check
> >> for NULL xhci->devs[i] already, so patch does not add much more, except
> >> for test for slot_id == 0. And the eps array is just array of
> >> struct xhci_virt_ep, not a pointers to them, so &xhci->devs[i]->eps[j]
> >> should be always valid pointer. However struct xhci_ring in each eps
> >> is allocated and not protected by any lock here. Is that correct?
> >
> > I think root cause is that freeing xhci->devs[i] and including rings isn't
> > protected by the lock, this happens in xhci_free_virt_device() called by
> > xhci_free_dev(), which in turn may be called by usbcore at any time
> >
> > So xhci->devs[i] might just suddenly disappear
> >
> > Patch just checks more often if xhci->devs[i] is valid, between every endpoint.
> > So the race between xhci_free_virt_device() and xhci_kill_endpoint_urbs()
> > doesn't trigger null pointer deref as easily.
>
> Jimmy Hu,
>
> Any chance you could try if the change below works for you instead of
> using xhci_get_virt_ep().
> I don't have a easy way to trigger the issue-
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> index 79d7931c048a..50b41213e827 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> @@ -3974,6 +3974,7 @@ static void xhci_free_dev(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev)
> struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd);
> struct xhci_virt_device *virt_dev;
> struct xhci_slot_ctx *slot_ctx;
> + unsigned long flags;
> int i, ret;
>
> /*
> @@ -4000,7 +4001,11 @@ static void xhci_free_dev(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev)
> virt_dev->eps[i].ep_state &= ~EP_STOP_CMD_PENDING;
> virt_dev->udev = NULL;
> xhci_disable_slot(xhci, udev->slot_id);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&xhci->lock, flags);
> xhci_free_virt_device(xhci, udev->slot_id);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xhci->lock, flags);
> +
> }
>
>
> Thanks
> Mathias
Mathias,
Sorry. I also don't have an easy way to trigger this issue.
Thanks,
Jimmy
