Re: Please apply to v5.10 stable: 4d60b475f858 ("rcu: Prevent lockdep-RCU splats on lock acquisition/release")

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 4:10 PM Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 28, 2022, at 9:39 PM, Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > Please apply to v5.10 stable: 4d60b475f858 ("rcu: Prevent lockdep-RCU splats
> > on lock acquisition/release"). The patch made it in v5.11
> >
> > Without it, I get the follow splat on TREE05 rcutorture testing:
> >
> > [    1.253678] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 5.10.162-rc1+ #6
> > [    1.253678] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
> > [    1.253678] Call Trace:
> > [    1.253678]
> > [    1.253678] =============================
> > [    1.253678] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> > [    1.253678] 5.10.162-rc1+ #6 Not tainted
> > [    1.253678] -----------------------------
> > [    1.253678] kernel/kprobes.c:300 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
> >
> > I tested with the patch and the warning is gone.
>
> Please hold off on this particular one. After a 12 hour test, I am seeing some new warnings. Will update the thread after some more debug.
>

Weirdly enough, the warning seems to be a false-positive from the
rcutorture scripts:

WARNING: Assertion failure in
/root/.jenkins/workspace/rcutorture_stable_linux-5.10.y@2/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/res/2022.12.29-02.23.56/TREE05/console.log
TREE05
WARNING: Summary:

But opening the console.log shows a normal flow followed by SUCCESS
message from the rcutorture kernel module.
Also "Summary:" is supposed to provide more information.

Here are some logs:
1. http://box.joelfernandes.org:9080/job/rcutorture_stable/job/linux-5.10.y/10/console
   (Scroll to the end)
2. http://box.joelfernandes.org:9080/job/rcutorture_stable/job/linux-5.10.y/10/artifact/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/res/2022.12.29-02.23.56/RUDE01/console.log

So this is probably something wrong with my setup, say something
interfered with the test. Or, there is something weird with the
scripts.

Anyway, re-running it with this patch overnight again!

 - Joel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux