On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 at 00:48, Giulio Benetti
<giulio.benetti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> zero_page is a void* pointer but memblock_alloc() returns phys_addr_t type
> so this generates a warning while using clang and with -Wint-error enabled
> that becomes and error. So let's cast the return of memblock_alloc() to
> (void *).
>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.14.x +
> Fixes: 340a982825f7 ("ARM: 9266/1: mm: fix no-MMU ZERO_PAGE() implementation")
> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mm/nommu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c b/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c
> index c1494a4dee25..53f2d8774fdb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ void __init paging_init(const struct machine_desc *mdesc)
> mpu_setup();
>
> /* allocate the zero page. */
> - zero_page = memblock_alloc(PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE);
> + zero_page = (void *)memblock_alloc(PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE);
> if (!zero_page)
> panic("%s: Failed to allocate %lu bytes align=0x%lx\n",
> __func__, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE);
> --
> 2.34.1
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
