On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 at 00:48, Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > zero_page is a void* pointer but memblock_alloc() returns phys_addr_t type > so this generates a warning while using clang and with -Wint-error enabled > that becomes and error. So let's cast the return of memblock_alloc() to > (void *). > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.14.x + > Fixes: 340a982825f7 ("ARM: 9266/1: mm: fix no-MMU ZERO_PAGE() implementation") > Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/mm/nommu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c b/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c > index c1494a4dee25..53f2d8774fdb 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ void __init paging_init(const struct machine_desc *mdesc) > mpu_setup(); > > /* allocate the zero page. */ > - zero_page = memblock_alloc(PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE); > + zero_page = (void *)memblock_alloc(PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE); > if (!zero_page) > panic("%s: Failed to allocate %lu bytes align=0x%lx\n", > __func__, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE); > -- > 2.34.1 -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org