Re: [PATCH] Documentation: stable: Add rule on what kind of patches are accepted

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/22/22 16:16, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> The list of rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and which ones
> are not into the “-stable” tree, did not mention anything about new
> features and let the reader use its own judgement. One may be under the
> impression that new features are not accepted at all, but that's not true:
> new features are not accepted unless they fix a reported problem.
> Update documentation with missing rule.
> 

Are there any other examples of problems that can "only" be solved by
introducing new features? Or new huge features that are virtually
harder to backport?

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux