Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/25] 6.1.1-rc1 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 08:11:35AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 04:10:55PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 07:00:49AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:22:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.1 release.
> > > > There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Build results:
> > > 	total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
> > > Qemu test results:
> > > 	total: 500 pass: 498 fail: 2
> > > Failed tests:
> > > 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:usb0:mem128:net,default:zynq-zc702:rootfs
> > > 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:usb0:mem128:zynq-zed:rootfs
> > > 
> > > The failure bisects to commit e013ba1e4e12 ("usb: ulpi: defer ulpi_register on
> > > ulpi_read_id timeout") and is inherited from mainline. Reverting the offending
> > > patch fixes the problem.
> > 
> > Odd, yet that same commit works just fine on 6.0 and 5.15 and 5.10?  I
> > hadn't had any reports of this being an issue on Linus's tree either,
> > did I miss those?
> > 
> 
> I testbed has a bad hair day. The reports for the other branches are wrong.
> I restarted the tests and expect them to fail there as well. Sorry for that.

No worries, I've deleted this patch from all branches now, thanks.

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux