On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 04:57:33PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > I'm more concerned about backports, when one backports #1 but not #2. In > theory, patch #2 fixes patch #1, because that introduced IMHO a real > regression -- a possible memory corruption when discarding a hwpoison > marker. Warnings are not nice but at least indicate that something needs a > second look. Note that backporting patch 1 only is exactly what I wanted to do here - it means his/her tree should not have the swapin error pte markers at all. The swapin error pte marker change only existed for a few days in Linus's tree, so no one should be backporting patch 2. Thanks, -- Peter Xu
