On Sun, 4 Dec 2022, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 09:41:34AM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Dec 2022, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 03:53:46PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > > > > > > As far as I can tell, this should be applied to 5.4 and earlier. It > > > > should apply cleanly but let me know if not. > > > > > > Queued up everywhere, thanks. > > > > Thanks for queueing them up, Greg, but please read through the thread: > > I have doubts on the 4.14 and 4.9 ones, which would want a different patch > > if we're going to make any change; but thought we could just leave those > > trees without the patch, and Nathan agreed. > > Oops, sorry, now dropped from 4.14 and 4.9 and I left the 4.19 one as > that one was ok to keep, right? That's right, the 5.4 and the 4.19 ones are straightforward. It was just the 4.14 and 4.9 ones which were questionable (because of other related infrastructure missing), so better dropped. Thanks, Hugh