[PATCH 6.0 196/289] io_uring: make poll refs more robust

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>

commit a26a35e9019fd70bf3cf647dcfdae87abc7bacea upstream.

poll_refs carry two functions, the first is ownership over the request.
The second is notifying the io_poll_check_events() that there was an
event but wake up couldn't grab the ownership, so io_poll_check_events()
should retry.

We want to make poll_refs more robust against overflows. Instead of
always incrementing it, which covers two purposes with one atomic, check
if poll_refs is elevated enough and if so set a retry flag without
attempts to grab ownership. The gap between the bias check and following
atomics may seem racy, but we don't need it to be strict. Moreover there
might only be maximum 4 parallel updates: by the first and the second
poll entries, __io_arm_poll_handler() and cancellation. From those four,
only poll wake ups may be executed multiple times, but they're protected
by a spin.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: Lin Ma <linma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: aa43477b04025 ("io_uring: poll rework")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c762bc31f8683b3270f3587691348a7119ef9c9d.1668963050.git.asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 io_uring/poll.c |   36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/io_uring/poll.c
+++ b/io_uring/poll.c
@@ -40,7 +40,14 @@ struct io_poll_table {
 };
 
 #define IO_POLL_CANCEL_FLAG	BIT(31)
-#define IO_POLL_REF_MASK	GENMASK(30, 0)
+#define IO_POLL_RETRY_FLAG	BIT(30)
+#define IO_POLL_REF_MASK	GENMASK(29, 0)
+
+/*
+ * We usually have 1-2 refs taken, 128 is more than enough and we want to
+ * maximise the margin between this amount and the moment when it overflows.
+ */
+#define IO_POLL_REF_BIAS	128
 
 #define IO_WQE_F_DOUBLE		1
 
@@ -58,6 +65,21 @@ static inline bool wqe_is_double(struct
 	return priv & IO_WQE_F_DOUBLE;
 }
 
+static bool io_poll_get_ownership_slowpath(struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
+	int v;
+
+	/*
+	 * poll_refs are already elevated and we don't have much hope for
+	 * grabbing the ownership. Instead of incrementing set a retry flag
+	 * to notify the loop that there might have been some change.
+	 */
+	v = atomic_fetch_or(IO_POLL_RETRY_FLAG, &req->poll_refs);
+	if (v & IO_POLL_REF_MASK)
+		return false;
+	return !(atomic_fetch_inc(&req->poll_refs) & IO_POLL_REF_MASK);
+}
+
 /*
  * If refs part of ->poll_refs (see IO_POLL_REF_MASK) is 0, it's free. We can
  * bump it and acquire ownership. It's disallowed to modify requests while not
@@ -66,6 +88,8 @@ static inline bool wqe_is_double(struct
  */
 static inline bool io_poll_get_ownership(struct io_kiocb *req)
 {
+	if (unlikely(atomic_read(&req->poll_refs) >= IO_POLL_REF_BIAS))
+		return io_poll_get_ownership_slowpath(req);
 	return !(atomic_fetch_inc(&req->poll_refs) & IO_POLL_REF_MASK);
 }
 
@@ -235,6 +259,16 @@ static int io_poll_check_events(struct i
 		 */
 		if ((v & IO_POLL_REF_MASK) != 1)
 			req->cqe.res = 0;
+		if (v & IO_POLL_RETRY_FLAG) {
+			req->cqe.res = 0;
+			/*
+			 * We won't find new events that came in between
+			 * vfs_poll and the ref put unless we clear the flag
+			 * in advance.
+			 */
+			atomic_andnot(IO_POLL_RETRY_FLAG, &req->poll_refs);
+			v &= ~IO_POLL_RETRY_FLAG;
+		}
 
 		/* the mask was stashed in __io_poll_execute */
 		if (!req->cqe.res) {