Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] libceph: gracefully handle large reply messages from the mon" failed to apply to 3.14-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:17:47PM +0400, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:30 PM,  <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > The patch below does not apply to the 3.14-stable tree.
>> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
>> > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
>> > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
>>
>> Hmm, git cherry-pick 73c3d4812b4c755efeca0140f606f83772a39ce4 on top of
>> both v3.14.18 and v3.14.18 + queue-3.14 works (applies, builds, runs)
>> for me.
>
> Really?  It breaks the build here, the issue is in the pr_warning part.
>
>> > diff --git a/net/ceph/mon_client.c b/net/ceph/mon_client.c
>> > index 067d3af2eaf6..61fcfc304f68 100644
>> > --- a/net/ceph/mon_client.c
>> > +++ b/net/ceph/mon_client.c
>> > @@ -1181,7 +1181,15 @@ static struct ceph_msg *mon_alloc_msg(struct ceph_connection *con,
>> >         if (!m) {
>> >                 pr_info("alloc_msg unknown type %d\n", type);
>> >                 *skip = 1;
>> > +       } else if (front_len > m->front_alloc_len) {
>> > +               pr_warning("mon_alloc_msg front %d > prealloc %d (%u#%llu)\n",
>> > +                          front_len, m->front_alloc_len,
>> > +                          (unsigned int)con->peer_name.type,
>> > +                          le64_to_cpu(con->peer_name.num));
>> > +               ceph_msg_put(m);
>> > +               m = ceph_msg_new(type, front_len, GFP_NOFS, false);
>> >         }
>> > +
>> >         return m;
>> >  }
>> >
>> >
>
> Ok, odd, I just tried it again, and it worked.  Must be going crazy
> here, sorry for the noise.
>
> Oh, what about 3.10?

Sorry, turns out 3.10 depends on the following:

3cea4c3071d4e55e9d7356efe9d0ebf92f0c2204
libceph: rename ceph_msg::front_max to front_alloc_len

Should I squash and send a backport or you'll just apply it separately?

Thanks,

                Ilya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]