From: Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit e17a025a47c66ca8499ae88d8046c4f0d7c9c057 ]
Commit d8c32d3971e4 ("drm/lima: Migrate to dev_pm_opp_set_config()")
introduced a regression as it may undo the clk_names setting in case
the optional regulator is missing. This resulted in test and performance
regressions with lima.
Restore the old behavior where clk_names is set separately so it is not
undone in case of a missing optional regulator.
Fixes: d8c32d3971e4 ("drm/lima: Migrate to dev_pm_opp_set_config()")
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <yuq825@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221027073200.3885839-1-nunes.erico@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
index 011be7ff51e1..bc8fb4e38d0a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
@@ -112,11 +112,6 @@ int lima_devfreq_init(struct lima_device *ldev)
unsigned long cur_freq;
int ret;
const char *regulator_names[] = { "mali", NULL };
- const char *clk_names[] = { "core", NULL };
- struct dev_pm_opp_config config = {
- .regulator_names = regulator_names,
- .clk_names = clk_names,
- };
if (!device_property_present(dev, "operating-points-v2"))
/* Optional, continue without devfreq */
@@ -124,7 +119,15 @@ int lima_devfreq_init(struct lima_device *ldev)
spin_lock_init(&ldevfreq->lock);
- ret = devm_pm_opp_set_config(dev, &config);
+ /*
+ * clkname is set separately so it is not affected by the optional
+ * regulator setting which may return error.
+ */
+ ret = devm_pm_opp_set_clkname(dev, "core");
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = devm_pm_opp_set_regulators(dev, regulator_names);
if (ret) {
/* Continue if the optional regulator is missing */
if (ret != -ENODEV)
--
2.35.1
