[PATCH 5.4 149/156] 9p: trans_fd/p9_conn_cancel: drop client lock earlier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 52f1c45dde9136f964d63a77d19826c8a74e2c7f upstream.

syzbot reported a double-lock here and we no longer need this
lock after requests have been moved off to local list:
just drop the lock earlier.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220904064028.1305220-1-asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: syzbot+50f7e8d06c3768dd97f3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/9p/trans_fd.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
@@ -205,6 +205,8 @@ static void p9_conn_cancel(struct p9_con
 		list_move(&req->req_list, &cancel_list);
 	}
 
+	spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
+
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(req, rtmp, &cancel_list, req_list) {
 		p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "call back req %p\n", req);
 		list_del(&req->req_list);
@@ -212,7 +214,6 @@ static void p9_conn_cancel(struct p9_con
 			req->t_err = err;
 		p9_client_cb(m->client, req, REQ_STATUS_ERROR);
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
 }
 
 static __poll_t





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux