On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:58 PM Roberto Sassu
<roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Define four return value flags (LSM_RET_NEG, LSM_RET_ZERO, LSM_RET_ONE,
> LSM_RET_GT_ONE), one for each interval of interest (< 0, = 0, = 1, > 1).
>
> Redefine the LSM_HOOK() macro to add return value flags as argument, and
> set the correct flags for each LSM hook.
>
> Implementors of new LSM hooks should do the same as well.
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 5.7.x
> Fixes: 9d3fdea789c8 ("bpf: lsm: Provide attachment points for BPF LSM programs")
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf_lsm.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 779 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 9 +-
> kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 5 +-
> security/bpf/hooks.c | 2 +-
> security/security.c | 4 +-
> 6 files changed, 466 insertions(+), 335 deletions(-)
Just a quick note here that even if we wanted to do something like
this, it is absolutely not -stable kernel material. No way.
--
paul-moore.com
