Re: [PATCH 01/21] uas: replace WARN_ON_ONCE() with lockdep_assert_held()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 14:00 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 09/10/2014 01:56 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 13:48 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Note this series is NOT intended for stable, but I accidentally
> >> had "cc = stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" in my .git/config when sending
> >> this series, please ignore for stable.
> >>
> >> NACK for stable.
> > 
> > If this is not for stable, what do you intend to do about
> > the problems in stable? For example patch#01 of this series
> > looks like clear stable material to me.
> 
> The plan for stable is mostly, as lame as that is, to make sure
> we get all the right quirks in place so that error handling
> does not get triggered, for now.

How? A medium can be defect. Short of entirely disabling it,
error handling will be triggered.

> I agree that once this set has seen wider testing, we should
> reconsider, and probably add it, to stable. But at this point
> in time I'm worried that it may cause regressions, and as such
> it is not stable material atm IHMO.

Well, we would exchange something known to work imperfectly
for something feared to work imperfectly.

	Regards
		Oliver


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]