On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 11:34 AM Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 11:21:49AM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> > This was an overlooked edge case when minor faults were added. In
> > general, minor faults have the same rough edge here as missing faults:
> > if we unregister while there are waiting threads, they will just remain
> > waiting forever, as there is no way for userspace to wake them after
> > unregistration. To work around this, userspace needs to carefully wake
> > everything before unregistering.
> >
> > So, wake for minor faults just like we already do for missing faults as
> > part of the unregistration process.
> >
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Fixes: 7677f7fd8be7 ("userfaultfd: add minor fault registration mode")
> > Reported-by: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/userfaultfd.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> > index 07c81ab3fd4d..7daee4b9481c 100644
> > --- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
> > +++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> > @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_unregister(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
> > start = vma->vm_start;
> > vma_end = min(end, vma->vm_end);
> >
> > - if (userfaultfd_missing(vma)) {
> > + if (userfaultfd_missing(vma) || userfaultfd_minor(vma)) {
> > /*
> > * Wake any concurrent pending userfault while
> > * we unregister, so they will not hang
> > --
> > 2.38.0.135.g90850a2211-goog
>
> Thanks, Axel. Is wr-protect mode also prone to this? Would a test case
> help too?
I'm not quite as familiar with uffd-wp, but I think so? At minimum, it
seems like waking can't *hurt*, and it would simplify the check
slightly -- if (userfaultfd_armed(vma)) {}
It would also mean if we add yet another registration mode in the
future, we wouldn't forget to update this.
I'll send a v2 to address both points.
>
> --
> Peter Xu
>
