Self NACK this one.
I misread the definition, and extrapolated from the init data.
The original code is correct. Sorry about the noise.
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> clk_register_mux takes both register bit shift and mask as parameters
> to which bits it should use to control the clock mux.
>
> sunxi_mux_clk_setup incorrectly passed the width of effective bits,
> instead of the bit mask. This would result in incorrect values being
> read or set.
>
> Fixes: e874a6697710 ("clk: arm: sunxi: Add a new clock driver for sunxi SOCs")
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>
> We never ran into this because the mux clks do not have auto-reparenting
> enabled, and the only time we did reparent was in the sun6i dma driver.
> Luckily the new value is the same as the mask there.
>
> ---
> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> index b654b7b..df61199 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static struct clk * __init sunxi_factors_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
> * sunxi_mux_clk_setup() - Setup function for muxes
> */
>
> -#define SUNXI_MUX_GATE_WIDTH 2
> +#define SUNXI_MUX_GATE_MASK 0x3
>
> struct mux_data {
> u8 shift;
> @@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ static void __init sunxi_mux_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
>
> clk = clk_register_mux(NULL, clk_name, parents, i,
> CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, reg,
> - data->shift, SUNXI_MUX_GATE_WIDTH,
> + data->shift, SUNXI_MUX_GATE_MASK,
> 0, &clk_lock);
>
> if (clk) {
> --
> 2.1.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html