On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 09:50:26PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 09/03/2014 04:44 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 03:04:50PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >>This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.54 release. > >>There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >>to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >>let me know. > >> > >>Responses should be made by Fri Sep 5 22:04:21 UTC 2014. > >>Anything received after that time might be too late. > >> > >>The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > >> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.54-rc1.gz > >>and the diffstat can be found below. > > > >-rc2 is now out to resolve some reported errors: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.54-rc2.gz > > > > > Build results: > total: 137 pass: 137 fail: 0 > > Most of the qemu tests passed except for mips:smp, which crashes with > > BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: kjournald/44 > > This is not a new problem, but an old one discovered due to an added > qemu test. I sent you a reference to a patch to fix this problem > a couple of weeks ago. Let me know if I should resend it. My stable patch queue is well over 200 patches yet to be applied, don't worry, it's not lost, just behind a bunch of others... thanks for testing all of these. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html