On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 16:54 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> The ACPI CEDT.CFMWS indicates a range of possible address where new CXL
> regions can appear. Each range is associated with a QTG id (QoS
> Throttling Group id). For each range + QTG pair that is not covered by a proximity
> domain in the SRAT, Linux creates a new NUMA node. However, the commit
> that added the new ranges missed updating the node_possible mask which
> causes memory_group_register() to fail. Add the new nodes to the
> nodes_possible mask.
>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: fd49f99c1809 ("ACPI: NUMA: Add a node and memblk for each CFMWS not in SRAT")
> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Rafael, I can take this through the CXL tree with some other pending
> fixes.
>
> drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> index 3b818ab186be..1f4fc5f8a819 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> @@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> pr_warn("ACPI NUMA: Failed to add memblk for CFMWS node %d [mem %#llx-%#llx]\n",
> node, start, end);
> }
> + node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
>
> /* Set the next available fake_pxm value */
> (*fake_pxm)++;
>
