Re: v5.19 & v6.0 stable backport request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 19 Oct 2022, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 08:55:55AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 02:02:08PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> > 
>> > Hello stable team, please backport these two commits to stable kernels
>> > v5.19 and v6.0:
>> > 
>> > 4e78d6023c15 ("drm/i915/bios: Validate fp_timing terminator presence")
>> 
>> Does not apply to 5.19.y, can you provide a working backport?
>> 
>> > d3a7051841f0 ("drm/i915/bios: Use hardcoded fp_timing size for generating LFP data pointers")
>> 
>> Queued up to both trees now, thanks.
>
> No, wait, that breaks the build!
>
> How did you test this?  I'm dropping both of these now.
>
> Please resubmit a set of tested patches if you wish to have them applied
> to the tree.  These were obviously not even attempted, which just wastes
> all of our time :(

Apologies, misunderstanding on my part about them being applicable
as-is.

Ville has provided the backports. Thanks!


BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux