On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 05:33:09PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 10:28:45AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit 7dac7991408f77b0b33ee5e6b729baa683889277 ]
> >
> > Commit eeca7d46217c ("arm64: dts: qcom: pm8350c: Drop PWM reg declaration")
> > dropped PWM reg declaration for pm8350c pwm(s), but there is a leftover
> > 'reg' entry inside the lpg/pwm node in sc8280xp dts file. Remove the same.
> >
> > While at it, also remove the unused unit address in the node
> > label.
> >
> > Also, since dt-bindings expect LPG/PWM node name to be "pwm",
> > use correct node name as well, to fix the following
> > error reported by 'make dtbs_check':
> >
> > 'lpg' does not match any of the regexes
> >
> > Fixes: eeca7d46217c ("arm64: dts: qcom: pm8350c: Drop PWM reg declaration")
>
> Despite the Fixes tag, this is not a bug a fix but rather a cleanup for
> compliance with the DT schema (for which there are thousands of similar
> warnings).
>
> Please drop.
Now dropped, thanks.
greg k-h
