[PATCH 6.0 212/862] erofs: fix order >= MAX_ORDER warning due to crafted negative i_size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 1dd73601a1cba37a0ed5f89a8662c90191df5873 ]

As syzbot reported [1], the root cause is that i_size field is a
signed type, and negative i_size is also less than EROFS_BLKSIZ.
As a consequence, it's handled as fast symlink unexpectedly.

Let's fall back to the generic path to deal with such unusual i_size.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/000000000000ac8efa05e7feaa1f@xxxxxxxxxx

Reported-by: syzbot+f966c13b1b4fc0403b19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 431339ba9042 ("staging: erofs: add inode operations")
Reviewed-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220909023948.28925-1-hsiangkao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/erofs/inode.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/erofs/inode.c b/fs/erofs/inode.c
index 95a403720e8c..16cf9a283557 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/inode.c
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int erofs_fill_symlink(struct inode *inode, void *kaddr,
 
 	/* if it cannot be handled with fast symlink scheme */
 	if (vi->datalayout != EROFS_INODE_FLAT_INLINE ||
-	    inode->i_size >= EROFS_BLKSIZ) {
+	    inode->i_size >= EROFS_BLKSIZ || inode->i_size < 0) {
 		inode->i_op = &erofs_symlink_iops;
 		return 0;
 	}
-- 
2.35.1






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux