From: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 66a7a92e4d0d091e79148a4c6ec15d1da65f4280 ]
In __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch() if htab_lock_bucket() returns
-EBUSY, it will go to next bucket. Going to next bucket may not only
skip the elements in current bucket silently, but also incur
out-of-bound memory access or expose kernel memory to userspace if
current bucket_cnt is greater than bucket_size or zero.
Fixing it by stopping batch operation and returning -EBUSY when
htab_lock_bucket() fails, and the application can retry or skip the busy
batch as needed.
Fixes: 20b6cc34ea74 ("bpf: Avoid hashtab deadlock with map_locked")
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220831042629.130006-3-houtao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index ad09da139589..75f77df910dc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -1704,8 +1704,11 @@ __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
/* do not grab the lock unless need it (bucket_cnt > 0). */
if (locked) {
ret = htab_lock_bucket(htab, b, batch, &flags);
- if (ret)
- goto next_batch;
+ if (ret) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ bpf_enable_instrumentation();
+ goto after_loop;
+ }
}
bucket_cnt = 0;
--
2.35.1
