On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:09:54AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 06:12:03PM +0200, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > The patch below does not apply to the 6.0-stable tree.
> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> >
> > Possible dependencies:
> >
> > f9929f69de94 ("drm/simpledrm: Fix return type of simpledrm_simple_display_pipe_mode_valid()")
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> >
> > From f9929f69de94212f98b3ad72a3e81c3bd3d333e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:36:29 -0700
> > Subject: [PATCH] drm/simpledrm: Fix return type of
> > simpledrm_simple_display_pipe_mode_valid()
>
> Just for the record, this change is already in the stable trees it is
> relevant for, as it was a part of 5.19:
>
> 5.19 and 6.0: 0c09bc33aa8e ("drm/simpledrm: Fix return type of simpledrm_simple_display_pipe_mode_valid()")
> 5.15: 11c1cc3f6e42 ("drm/simpledrm: Fix return type of simpledrm_simple_display_pipe_mode_valid()")
>
> I am not sure how a second copy (f9929f69de94) ended up in the tree
> during the 6.1 cycle, I am guessing it was cherry picked to a
> development branch from a fixes branch, rather than backmerged.
>
> TL;DR: Nothing for stable to do here.
Thanks, that's how the drm tree works, they like to have multiple copies
of patches in the tree in places...
thanks,
greg k-h
