The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
Possible dependencies:
5623f751bd9c ("KVM: x86: Treat #DBs from the emulator as fault-like (code and DR7.GD=1)")
a61d7c5432ac ("KVM: x86: Trace re-injected exceptions")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 5623f751bd9c438ed12840e086f33c4646440d19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 23:15:55 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Treat #DBs from the emulator as fault-like (code
and DR7.GD=1)
Add a dedicated "exception type" for #DBs, as #DBs can be fault-like or
trap-like depending the sub-type of #DB, and effectively defer the
decision of what to do with the #DB to the caller.
For the emulator's two calls to exception_type(), treat the #DB as
fault-like, as the emulator handles only code breakpoint and general
detect #DBs, both of which are fault-like.
For event injection, which uses exception_type() to determine whether to
set EFLAGS.RF=1 on the stack, keep the current behavior of not setting
RF=1 for #DBs. Intel and AMD explicitly state RF isn't set on code #DBs,
so exempting by failing the "== EXCPT_FAULT" check is correct. The only
other fault-like #DB is General Detect, and despite Intel and AMD both
strongly implying (through omission) that General Detect #DBs should set
RF=1, hardware (multiple generations of both Intel and AMD), in fact does
not. Through insider knowledge, extreme foresight, sheer dumb luck, or
some combination thereof, KVM correctly handled RF for General Detect #DBs.
Fixes: 38827dbd3fb8 ("KVM: x86: Do not update EFLAGS on faulting emulation")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220830231614.3580124-9-seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index ee22264ab471..ee3041da222b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -533,6 +533,7 @@ static int exception_class(int vector)
#define EXCPT_TRAP 1
#define EXCPT_ABORT 2
#define EXCPT_INTERRUPT 3
+#define EXCPT_DB 4
static int exception_type(int vector)
{
@@ -543,8 +544,14 @@ static int exception_type(int vector)
mask = 1 << vector;
- /* #DB is trap, as instruction watchpoints are handled elsewhere */
- if (mask & ((1 << DB_VECTOR) | (1 << BP_VECTOR) | (1 << OF_VECTOR)))
+ /*
+ * #DBs can be trap-like or fault-like, the caller must check other CPU
+ * state, e.g. DR6, to determine whether a #DB is a trap or fault.
+ */
+ if (mask & (1 << DB_VECTOR))
+ return EXCPT_DB;
+
+ if (mask & ((1 << BP_VECTOR) | (1 << OF_VECTOR)))
return EXCPT_TRAP;
if (mask & ((1 << DF_VECTOR) | (1 << MC_VECTOR)))
@@ -8844,6 +8851,12 @@ int x86_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
unsigned long rflags = static_call(kvm_x86_get_rflags)(vcpu);
toggle_interruptibility(vcpu, ctxt->interruptibility);
vcpu->arch.emulate_regs_need_sync_to_vcpu = false;
+
+ /*
+ * Note, EXCPT_DB is assumed to be fault-like as the emulator
+ * only supports code breakpoints and general detect #DB, both
+ * of which are fault-like.
+ */
if (!ctxt->have_exception ||
exception_type(ctxt->exception.vector) == EXCPT_TRAP) {
kvm_pmu_trigger_event(vcpu, PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS);
@@ -9767,6 +9780,16 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool *req_immediate_exit)
/* try to inject new event if pending */
if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending) {
+ /*
+ * Fault-class exceptions, except #DBs, set RF=1 in the RFLAGS
+ * value pushed on the stack. Trap-like exception and all #DBs
+ * leave RF as-is (KVM follows Intel's behavior in this regard;
+ * AMD states that code breakpoint #DBs excplitly clear RF=0).
+ *
+ * Note, most versions of Intel's SDM and AMD's APM incorrectly
+ * describe the behavior of General Detect #DBs, which are
+ * fault-like. They do _not_ set RF, a la code breakpoints.
+ */
if (exception_type(vcpu->arch.exception.nr) == EXCPT_FAULT)
__kvm_set_rflags(vcpu, kvm_get_rflags(vcpu) |
X86_EFLAGS_RF);
